These Ferguson are R-DF21 >> S7858 Sct2VA. Note that two kits share DYS576=18. The boxes highlighted in green illustrate the process of triangulation leading to the conclusion that their most recent common ancestor George L Ferguson also had DYS576=18.
FTDNA Configuration - DNA Results Comparison | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | D Y S 3 9 3 |
D Y S 3 9 0 |
D Y S 1 9 |
D Y S 3 9 1 |
D Y S 3 8 5 |
D Y S 4 2 6 |
D Y S 3 8 8 |
D Y S 4 3 9 |
D Y S 3 8 9 - 1 |
D Y S 3 9 2 |
D Y S 3 8 9 - 2 |
D Y S 4 5 8 |
D Y S 4 5 9 |
D Y S 4 5 5 |
D Y S 4 5 4 |
D Y S 4 4 7 |
D Y S 4 3 7 |
D Y S 4 4 8 |
D Y S 4 4 9 |
D Y S 4 6 4 |
D Y S 4 6 0 |
Y - G A T A - H 4 |
Y C A I I |
D Y S 4 5 6 |
D Y S 6 0 7 |
D Y S 5 7 6 |
D Y S 5 7 0 |
C D Y |
D Y S 4 4 2 |
D Y S 4 3 8 |
D Y S 5 3 1 |
D Y S 5 7 8 |
D Y F 3 9 5 S 1 |
D Y S 5 9 0 |
D Y S 5 3 7 |
D Y S 6 4 1 |
D Y S 4 7 2 |
D Y F 4 0 6 S 1 |
D Y S 5 1 1 |
D Y S 4 2 5 |
D Y S 4 1 3 |
D Y S 5 5 7 |
D Y S 5 9 4 |
D Y S 4 3 6 |
D Y S 4 9 0 |
D Y S 5 3 4 |
D Y S 4 5 0 |
D Y S 4 4 4 |
D Y S 4 8 1 |
D Y S 5 2 0 |
D Y S 4 4 6 |
D Y S 6 1 7 |
D Y S 5 6 8 |
D Y S 4 8 7 |
D Y S 5 7 2 |
D Y S 6 4 0 |
D Y S 4 9 2 |
D Y S 5 6 5 |
|||||
modal | 13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11-14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 16 | 9-10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 15-15-17-18 | 11 | 11 | 19-23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 37-37 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 15-16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23-23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | |||||
13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11-14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 17 | 9-10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 15-15-17-18 | 11 | 11 | 19-23 | 16 | 15 | 19 | 16 | 37-37 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 15-16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23-24 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11-14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 16 | 9-10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 15-15-17-18 | 11 | 11 | 19-23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 38-38 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 15-16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23-23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11-14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 16 | 9-10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 15-15-17-18 | 11 | 11 | 19-23 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 37-38 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 15-16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23-23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11-14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 30 | 16 | 9-10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 15-15-17-18 | 11 | 11 | 19-23 | 16 | 15 | 20 | 16 | 37-37 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 15-16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23-23 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
|
The table below compare the actual pairwise TMRCA as deduced from the above diagram with theoretical computations of the 5% and 95% TMRCA. With one exception, the actual TMRCA are greater than the 5% numbers and less than the 95% numbers as they probably should be. All the data fall within the 1% to 99% range. It is concluded the resultant set of pairwise actual TMRCA defined by the genealogical structure is consistent with the corresponding set of pairwise TMRCA computed from the DNA mismatches.
TMRCA Actual vs Theoretical Range |
||||||
ID | ||||||
67 | 6 | 6 | 6.5 | |||
8-32 | 67 | 3 | 6.5 | |||
6-27 | 1-15 | 67 | 6.5 | |||
4-23 | 4-23 | 2-19 | 67 | |||
|
||||||
- Infinite allele mutation model is used
- Average mutation rate varies: 0.0026 to 0.0026 - Mutation rates from Heinilia, 2012 - Values on the diagonal indicate number of markers tested - The TMRCA is expected to be in the range shown (5% to 95%) - Related means in a genealogical time frame as defined by ISOGG |
William or William Fergason, Judah or Judith, W7263, BLW # 26900-160-55, Va ( Virginia ) Line, soldier married Judah Woods and a Belfield Woods signed marriage bond with soldier on 7 Feb 1791 in Greene Co NC, widow applied 6 Jan 1842 Habersham Co GA aged 66, soldier and widow had married 10 Feb 1791, soldier died 9 Dec 1834, soldier had applied 30 Sept 1833 Cumberland Co KY aged 69 in May 1833, soldier was born 11 May 1764 in Amelia Co VA and soldier lived there at enlistment and after the Rev War soldier moved to Bedford Co VA for several years then moved to Hawkins Co ( now in TN ) NC then to Pendleton District or Co SC and in 1811 moved to Franklin Co TN and in 1813 moved to Cumberland Co KY, widow applied for BLW 30 march 1855 Habersham Co GA in 1868 aged 48, a grandson James S. Davis was mentioned, the aforesaid marriage bond of soldier and widow was signed in Greene Co NC but later became TN [Revolutionary War Pension Files]
Copyright © 2008 - 2018 Fergus(s)on Y-DNA Project